Re: [IPsec] WESP - Roadmap Ahead

Gregory Lebovitz <gregory.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 17 November 2009 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <gregory.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609A23A69C7 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:03:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ra+IZyPJIq2Y for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:03:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577873A6AED for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:03:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so142593fga.13 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:03:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PILtq3kSqS7ZpXLbejTGFF8qZSqS+RynMRklqJ6USuc=; b=I/xm+w9e4mmJsbTqUCb2RBZc2GrInv0BoqScEHzhZ7S9M3i0eM/nPWSYFVfwnQTR6D iRf5ui5jRjQUACq9MCjfhwv3T5QJ3BjSIFV52iGONpVCFqqHbO3ZMLDTBb9F9Z9P+k8k 01L6sVbpQX0NJhnyTxBdGGmtsDziiaYmMmnm4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=u/RWqAZLoD37Ytk7m+NTb5d/jQYKbef/4yWHuOizDc/IqFabugrlnxX25HCT4Y7NtU M1KxzcMXeSyvMXqDiujm3l5xItUS4z+CYl4Dba0VvJubdh+yygZ0FLgGMiWnjCSiObst MsQnRdUtEUgSwYzcJdMPItb9AZzHKbO9ZTih4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.87.38.33 with SMTP id q33mr419919fgj.3.1258484584304; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:03:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <p06240805c7272bb53718@128.89.89.228>
References: <dc8fd0140911110805q67759507t6cf75a1e9d81c5aa@mail.gmail.com> <19200.8786.266973.313959@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <19201.20208.563706.519993@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <p06240805c7272bb53718@128.89.89.228>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:03:04 -0800
Message-ID: <f1548840911171103m4d39e544q236448d4b1c8eefe@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Lebovitz <gregory.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364593c49a4fac047895c620
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>, "Bhatia, Manav \(Manav\)" <manav.bhatia@alcatel-lucent.com>, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] WESP - Roadmap Ahead
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:03:13 -0000

inline...

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>; wrote:

> At 7:50 PM +0530 11/16/09, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote:
>
>> This is an implementation specific optimization that has already been
>> solved in multiple implementations.
>>
>> Cheers, Manav
>>
>
> Is the phrase "implementation specific" a euphemism for non-standard?
>

GML>  Or perhaps, a local security policy decision to ease up on the size of
the enforcement window -- aka ease security requirements -- in order to get
more QoS enforcement capability -- aka convenience -- ??

GML> Gregory


>
> Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>



-- 
----
IETF related email from
Gregory M. Lebovitz
Juniper Networks