Re: [IPsec] RFC4869 bis submitted
Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Fri, 13 November 2009 02:37 UTC
Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAAF53A6955 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:37:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.526
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.526 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.073, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6VXiwarEF0w9 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:37:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174823A683D for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:37:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dommiel.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15] helo=[133.93.16.246]) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1N8m3E-0002rv-Bh for ipsec@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:38:16 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p0624080cc72276cea756@[133.93.16.246]>
In-Reply-To: <p06240845c7225d09166e@[133.93.128.35]>
References: <D22B261D1FA3CD48B0414DF484E43D3211B49B@celebration.infosec.tycho.ncsc.mil > <006FEB08D9C6444AB014105C9AEB133FB36A4EBFB3@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com> <p06240845c7225d09166e@[133.93.128.35]>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:38:13 -0500
To: ipsec@ietf.org
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [IPsec] RFC4869 bis submitted
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:37:48 -0000
I agree with all of Paul's observations. The scope of this profile is entirely appropriate. Steve
- Re: [IPsec] RFC4869 bis submitted Yoav Nir
- [IPsec] RFC4869 bis submitted Law, Laurie
- Re: [IPsec] RFC4869 bis submitted Dan McDonald
- Re: [IPsec] RFC4869 bis submitted Scott C Moonen
- Re: [IPsec] RFC4869 bis submitted Paul Hoffman
- Re: [IPsec] RFC4869 bis submitted Stephen Kent
- Re: [IPsec] RFC4869 bis submitted Scott C Moonen
- Re: [IPsec] RFC4869 bis submitted Scott C Moonen
- Re: [IPsec] RFC4869 bis submitted Yoav Nir
- Re: [IPsec] RFC4869 bis submitted Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: [IPsec] RFC4869 bis submitted Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: [IPsec] RFC4869 bis submitted Paul Hoffman
- Re: [IPsec] RFC4869 bis submitted Paul Hoffman