[IPsec] IPsec multihoming and mobility

Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 21 October 2009 08:29 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0721B3A657C; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BEmED9XS+1Qt; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com (mail-fx0-f218.google.com [209.85.220.218]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D503A6804; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so7443043fxm.37 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=ZV0ctBgXTHjEqGpqYDJJMzGdk0Z25QyOfWSmzGfkbEw=; b=jtToMWyYXSLH7S/JFNklfTwJqiNn+Q/3skUsNEBGaVzf2NXrN0y9Udtk/6q6VmObq8 1q92Nf93471W8afmc860aJoqjeNEr2SWGbN3Z985llEZMTF3S2sDrglcSn/mFUjbHFuQ vmoxWfFjWW/qif9zkwhL8c2AlUG0ISMNWys3k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=qXe0mz7fzObgmmDoT9v8dP9Bieh+zl81JCtXcxb2tiwXkxxl6AdO5ABI7iEOufq6Mv VgLo2ylSO10jjPTBp1ZaDN+EJzfNPol07muHoa896AwfjT3w/RWBLdLUDn+tDmKtUm/N W1D4N1H4h9ij5mRhpouu2Y8e7f441Yx9HD6ss=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.7.31 with SMTP id k31mr3356636mui.48.1256113790909; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:29:50 +0200
Message-ID: <51eafbcb0910210129x60cf00eek4ee53df746e515a8@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
To: mif@ietf.org, ipsec@ietf.org, multipathtcp@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016364174854dfc5004766dc8df"
Subject: [IPsec] IPsec multihoming and mobility
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:29:51 -0000

Hi folks,

We are currently working on IPsec issues and multihoming. Here are our
starting work with a presentation of scenarios and requirements we address,
as well as the design of an extension to MOBIKE.

Scenarios and Requirements :
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mglt-ipsec-mm-requirements-00

Protocol Design :
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mglt-ipsec-mm-mobikex-00

We are currently working implementing it, and looking on how other
multihoming protocol can benefit from it.

Feed backs  and comments are really appreciated.

Regards,

Daniel


-- 
Daniel Migault
Orange Labs -- Security
+33 6 70 72 69 58