IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] New draft on IKE Diffie-Hellman checks

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Fri, 21 December 2012 09:56 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B0D21F8AF8 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 01:56:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8HeLtJ+cw0Li for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 01:56:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.kivinen.iki.fi (fireball.kivinen.iki.fi [IPv6:2001:1bc8:100d::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B3F21F8539 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 01:56:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBL9unkR003476 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:56:49 +0200 (EET)
Received: (from kivinen@localhost) by fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.5/8.12.11) id qBL9ulgP007355; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:56:47 +0200 (EET)
X-Authentication-Warning: fireball.kivinen.iki.fi: kivinen set sender to kivinen@iki.fi using -f
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <20692.12895.718495.872957@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:56:47 +0200
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: Johannes Merkle <johannes.merkle@secunet.com>
In-Reply-To: <50D31B35.8090104@secunet.com>
References: <50C62D6A.8010709@gmail.com> <5808c090d8485cc6698829b522fade80.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <A113ACFD9DF8B04F96395BDEACB340421E6940@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <50C9B0B5.9090600@secunet.com> <A113ACFD9DF8B04F96395BDEACB340421E71FE@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <a5622369ac2e85b8b04cefea05c832b8.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <20691.6156.393731.420290@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <50D31B35.8090104@secunet.com>
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1
X-Edit-Time: 2 min
X-Total-Time: 1 min
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>, Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>, "Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)" <sfluhrer@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] New draft on IKE Diffie-Hellman checks
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:56:58 -0000

Johannes Merkle writes:
> >
> > I.e. make the document define the generic ideas in the body, make IANA
> > considerations section to add the note field to the IANA registry,
> > which specifies this RFC and subsection in it for each group.
> > 
> Which way to prefer for the "new" EC groups, i.e. the Brainpool I-Ds
> from Dan and me? 
> 1. Also include references to these I-D in the draft IKE
> Diffie-Hellman checks

Yes, reference to the Diffie-Hellman checks RFC is needed.

> 2. Include a note in the IANA section of each Brainpool I-D to add
> for these curves a reference to the corresponding section of the
> DH-checks RFC?

Yes. 
-- 
kivinen@iki.fi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email