Re: [IPsec] IP-TFS YANG and MIB Updated

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Sun, 14 November 2021 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B392C3A0B6C for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 06:31:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.852, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=iki.fi
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IEyk_iwPiuaJ for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 06:31:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from meesny.iki.fi (meesny.iki.fi [195.140.195.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 139E43A0B68 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 06:31:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fireball.acr.fi (fireball.acr.fi [83.145.195.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kivinen@iki.fi) by meesny.iki.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A270C2021D; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:31:33 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iki.fi; s=meesny; t=1636900293; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sSL329kiZfDZL6pPxQALQt/c+mgK/Aw9GBLcBINbyts=; b=sLtDb+Hvai8wEZ8SuSc0hW4tA5uR5SbADt2yJKPo6xLwwnxV7NPpRsFgdVWUYC3DxtIbbj R3kmYSQ5OHl24Z2YyEJnfAsuLrm8kl9gDqARi7vysyrYKzbYkvDNH5/0rccwKJt69Xqsms GDLIz8saLu2J4mBkItRewZvU+PLQQqI=
Received: by fireball.acr.fi (Postfix, from userid 15204) id 1AF0125C12CF; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:31:32 +0200 (EET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <24977.7620.51527.423394@fireball.acr.fi>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:31:32 +0200
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
Cc: Don Fedyk <dfedyk@labn.net>, ipsec@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <m2v90v2hlx.fsf@ja.int.chopps.org>
References: <MN2PR14MB4030C4563988AFEBDBD60C3DBB959@MN2PR14MB4030.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <24974.48797.989744.890700@fireball.acr.fi> <m2v90v2hlx.fsf@ja.int.chopps.org>
X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 26.3 (x86_64--netbsd)
X-Edit-Time: 7 min
X-Total-Time: 3 min
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=kivinen@iki.fi smtp.mailfrom=kivinen@iki.fi
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=meesny; d=iki.fi; t=1636900293; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=WzZTL7UMLfu/veuIOAQCK0XoVa7U/FLj5hh8m9Htpmj4tlgJwfQdoGbqeSChqeWxx0AZDO enXMhqzRqT20MIK6pq4tGvROI3WApIjfpfqjohIbL9rVKcXxPulzVXh8JIpPytruW9IV3G X/Bv/KG4aVGXR/jk2JhD+XT6lA4UvFA=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iki.fi; s=meesny; t=1636900293; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sSL329kiZfDZL6pPxQALQt/c+mgK/Aw9GBLcBINbyts=; b=rVlcrOIoT1mC5AwOs9IuSxG8fgbgXzUpH2w2gb/KLIrVONQTj9ujlVf68fM9WyZpQnw6+U IGnm70O4eDep0lXuKC3ArUgxPGkyJsx04T6g0eR/D5ozuAJPZ2nazbNNH6XyZcoJ1gMH11 hw+09UAOr6k/Mk0OJwPoU86E0W6JCYg=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/NXtmX5DkaJ2i-kq2Q_AcEnsbius>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IP-TFS YANG and MIB Updated
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 14:31:42 -0000

Christian Hopps writes:
> > Or if it is other way then add text saying "If this is true then inner
> > packets that are larger than what can be tranmitted in outer packets
> > will be dropped.".
> 
> "Disable packet fragmentation across consecutive iptfs tunnel
> packets; inner packets larger than what can be transmitted in outer
> packets will be dropped.";

That is good. 

> >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs-01.txt
> >
> > Same changes than in Yang document is needed here too.
> >
> > Also remove the last sentence of the abstract, i.e. I do not think
> > there is no need to say "This is an unpublished work in progress.",
> > in internet drafts, as they are working documents anyways...

As I sent already in my private email the mib document also needs the
IANA considerations section and splitting references to normative and
informative.

And the Security Considerations section of MIB document needs to use
the MIB security considerations boilerplate as described in
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/mib-security page.

(Just repeating these important points here so they do not get lost,
as I earlier only sent them to authors).
-- 
kivinen@iki.fi