IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: (with COMMENT)

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Sat, 17 November 2018 06:15 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC98129619; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 22:15:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p80O_Ocp95uv; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 22:15:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E47E128CE4; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 22:15:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42xlFN5V7pz5Gb; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:15:04 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1542435304; bh=SMYb7HDPTUzQzNYMk+gAJsbkcWQDHo20JguUEKkL4lM=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=SPetfXWr8cjmM2Q6+oHbBLTJQi8NmRINB03tuPZ577YraLu5ntcd+KHH7UdUycoP0 qPeLxa1x5Y+1joN6g7G9Ow8RCcaBlma7NjROK78WuUpRhMc++pqz9+xEQIr/tdPuDe RQmYus8WkGtJjbSIdKP1LUUlZGoxsCti6n37w1h8=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eG5toCw9XvfX; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:15:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:15:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 214F74E18C0; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 01:15:01 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca 214F74E18C0
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151F641C3B2D; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 01:15:01 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 01:15:01 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: "Waltermire, David A. (Fed)" <david.waltermire=40nist.gov@dmarc.ietf.org>
cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>, "ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org" <ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR09MB326474D2688D48194948243BF0DD0@SN6PR09MB3264.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1811170111570.1682@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <154233104861.10051.7593212496190352066.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <SN6PR09MB326474D2688D48194948243BF0DD0@SN6PR09MB3264.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/O0gn-SDMccyjy1NMCgmumsQwsPs>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 06:15:11 -0000

On Fri, 16 Nov 2018, Waltermire, David A. (Fed) wrote:

> One comment on your COMMENT wearing chair and shepherd hats:
>
>> We have to use DNS presentation format for the DS records and not wire
>> format?
>
> The group was "split" on this question. We did a hum, with most responding in the room that they either did not care or had a slight preference for presentation format. This is why it is this way.

Note that we did not use humming as a vote. The humming gave an idea of
the room that the disadvantage of IKE software needing to understand and
convert wire to/from presentation format only to prevent "string
overflow errors" was not worth the trouble of forcing a wire format,
especially since IKE just relays this information to another
application, and this API almost certainly uses presentation format
(for example, unbound-control)

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email