Re: Replay field size in AH
Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Sat, 08 February 1997 19:08 UTC
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id OAA27495 for ipsec-outgoing; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 14:08:40 -0500 (EST)
X-Sender: kent@po1.bbn.com
Message-Id: <v0300780aaf22800e1314@[128.33.229.242]>
In-Reply-To: <9702071420.AA27311@ftp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 1997 14:13:47 -0500
To: Naganand Doraswamy <naganand@ftp.com>
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Subject: Re: Replay field size in AH
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
I'd like to hear from Jeff Schiller and the WG chairs re this still open issue. My recollection is that there was supposed to be a small meetng to reolve this after the last IPSEC WG meeting in San Jose. I observed that we had two variables affecting aligmment: sequence number size and HMAC size. Hugo made a suggestion to truncate the SHA-1 value to 128 bits, to reduce the number of variables affecting alignment, but I don't recall a decision on this, nor on the 32 vs. 64 bit sequence number. We do eed to nail this down so that the grand unified AH and ESP specs can proceed. Steve
- Replay field size in AH Naganand Doraswamy
- Re: Replay field size in AH Ran Atkinson
- Re: Replay field size in AH Stephen Kent
- RE: Replay field size in AH Rob Adams
- Re: Replay field size in AH Ran Atkinson
- Re: Replay field size in AH Rodney Thayer
- Re: Replay field size in AH Stephen Kent