RE: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)?
"Shriver, John" <john.shriver@intel.com> Thu, 14 October 1999 14:14 UTC
Received: from lists.tislabs.com (portal.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.101]) by mail.imc.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA19731; Thu, 14 Oct 1999 07:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id IAA28517 Thu, 14 Oct 1999 08:51:05 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <392A357CE6FFD111AC3E00A0C99848B001D6A3CA@hdsmsx31.hd.intel.com>
From: "Shriver, John" <john.shriver@intel.com>
To: 'Ari Huttunen' <Ari.Huttunen@datafellows.com>, ietf-ipsra@vpnc.org, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: RE: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)?
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 05:33:51 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk
L2TP provides the prevention of packet reordering that is REQUIRED by PPP. The PPP protocol assumes that packets under it will never be reordered. PPP would not work directly on top of IPSec, since IPSec does not offer a service with any assurance of packet ordering. The optional flow control for L2TP can also be used wisely to provide better performance (lower packet loss). Also, on Windows Dial-Up Networking, it provides a comfortable user model. This is not to be taken lightly.
- PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Ari Huttunen
- RE: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Shriver, John
- Re: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Ari Huttunen
- Re: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Scott G. Kelly
- Re[2]: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Jim Tiller
- Re[2]: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Stephen Kent
- RE: Re[2]: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Shriver, John
- RE: Re[2]: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Stephen Kent
- Re[2]: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Jim Tiller
- Re[6]: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Jim Tiller
- Re[4]: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Jim Tiller
- RE: Re[4]: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Shriver, John
- Re: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Scott G. Kelly
- Re: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: Re[2]: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Bernard Aboba
- Re: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Ari Huttunen
- RE: Re[2]: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Stephen Kent
- RE: Re[2]: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: Re[2]: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Stephen Kent
- RE: Re[2]: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: Re[2]: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Stephen Kent
- Re: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Paul Koning
- Re: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Ari Huttunen
- Re: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? David Chen
- Re: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? Ari Huttunen
- Re: PPP over IPSec (without L2TP)? David Chen