Re: IKE reference implementations

Niels Provos <provos@citi.umich.edu> Sun, 17 October 1999 00:20 UTC

Received: from lists.tislabs.com (portal.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.101]) by mail.imc.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA20922; Sat, 16 Oct 1999 17:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id TAA11353 Sat, 16 Oct 1999 19:07:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199910162309.TAA27615@india.citi.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: IKE reference implementations
From: Niels Provos <provos@citi.umich.edu>
In-Reply-To: Richard Guy Briggs, Sat, 16 Oct 1999 19:17:34 EDT
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@conscoop.ottawa.on.ca>
Cc: Sandy Harris <sandy.harris@sympatico.ca>, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 19:09:44 -0400
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk

In message <19991016191734.O6028@grendel.conscoop.ottawa.on.ca>, Richard Guy Br
iggs writes:
>> >Rich Neill wrote:
>> >> Are there any open (public domain) IKE reference
>> >> implementations available?
[...]
>So, what?  We are going to argue over the one true meaning of "free"?
>Put away your tomatoes.  This is a religious issue.  (I am working on
He said public domain.

Niels.