Re: [IPsec] Will it be a good idea if we join in meetecho?

Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Tue, 06 November 2012 04:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C5511E80BA for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:09:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ABsjSBvbwcZy for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:09:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B061821F84A8 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:09:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.26]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA649juE021816; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 06:09:46 +0200
X-CheckPoint: {50988AE2-3-1B221DC2-2FFFF}
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.34.26]) by il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) with mapi; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 06:09:44 +0200
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: "Will Liu (Shucheng)" <liushucheng@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 06:09:44 +0200
Thread-Topic: [IPsec] Will it be a good idea if we join in meetecho?
Thread-Index: Ac271I10adpV+p6VT9KXbxurLLPpSg==
Message-ID: <2A09E170-7C8E-4243-8069-297A9FFBFB18@checkpoint.com>
References: <C9B5F12337F6F841B35C404CF0554ACB2B9A4F60@szxeml546-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <C9B5F12337F6F841B35C404CF0554ACB2B9A4F60@szxeml546-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2A09E1707C8E42438069297A9FFBFB18checkpointcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Will it be a good idea if we join in meetecho?
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 04:09:54 -0000

Too late now that our meeting's over.


On Nov 5, 2012, at 9:40 PM, Will Liu (Shucheng) wrote:

Hi all,

I see that several WGs are in here. http://ietf85.conf.meetecho.com/
Do you think it would be a good idea that we also join this?

Will
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org<mailto:IPsec@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec