RE: comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-cbc-02.txt

Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com> Thu, 12 March 1998 19:09 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id OAA01576 for ipsec-outgoing; Thu, 12 Mar 1998 14:09:41 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=TimeStep_Corpora%l=TSNTSRV2-980312200042Z-2312@tsntsrv2.timestep.com>
From: Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com>
To: 'Markku-Juhani Saarinen' <mjos@ssh.fi>, "'ipsec@tis.com'" <ipsec@tis.com>
Subject: RE: comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-cbc-02.txt
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 15:00:42 -0500
X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.995.52
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

>From:	Markku-Juhani Saarinen [SMTP:mjos@ssh.fi]
>
>We feel that a 4-round variant of IDEA can not provide the level of
>security that it's key length would suggest. Cryptoanalytic attacks on 
>3 and 3.5 - round variants of IDEA has been published. 
>
How many rounds do you suggest for IDEA?
>
>The weak key lists are incomplete, as they will probably always be.
>The chances of hitting one at random is negligible. What's the point ?
>
>What do you suggest we do with the weak key lists?  From our knowledge, we
>did include all known weak keys.
>