IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IKEv2 (son-of-ike) draft

Derek Atkins <warlord@mit.edu> Wed, 21 November 2001 17:53 UTC

Received: from lists.tislabs.com (portal.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.101]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fALHr1810879; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:53:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA16210 Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:04:31 -0500 (EST)
To: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: Re: IKEv2 (son-of-ike) draft
References: <Pine.BSI.3.91.1011121120621.12699M-100000@spsystems.net>
From: Derek Atkins <warlord@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:13:24 -0500
In-Reply-To: Henry Spencer's message of "Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:07:21 -0500 (EST)"
Message-ID: <sjmoflwcaiz.fsf@benjamin.ihtfp.org>
Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk

Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net> writes:

> Uh, no, you miss the point -- this discussion is about a new standard,
> remember.  A new standard can pick one and say "do it *THAT* way, and
> no other".

Ahh, I did misunderstand.  I thought you meant "pick one" for an
implementor, not for the spec.  Yes, the spec should pick one (or two)
and say "implement these".  I would say X.509 and PGP :)

>                                                           Henry Spencer
>                                                        henry@spsystems.net

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord@MIT.EDU                        PGP key available

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status