IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Early code point assignment (was: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305-00.txt)

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 31 March 2015 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE00E1ACDB9 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 07:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Je5RxQnYffWE for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 07:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1D581ACDB2 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 07:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3lGYHb1P5qzCGw; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:40:59 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: mx.nohats.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca header.i=@nohats.ca header.b=KJLdESoY
X-OPENPGPKEY: Message passed unmodified
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pACS0LJRGFQb; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:40:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:40:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D016819A0; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:40:57 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1427812857; bh=PwLDC+VYSzB16CO0K+bOZwr6RoQVCjwzpVRjHxwmY3U=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=KJLdESoYMXqYSczGPStYxP25AMSAPeRmx8tseQlg5jxnHQngKF8pGALECSrfBE+IG o6r2DfKJllTpI8M6STauhxUAypHjJQLkJwbPHnkm4d/3gG++uU7yJFRGZinq3rqQfT sDxqn5ZxbfK67JdZLlbzbflYeV7r//iNzSu0Lyew=
Received: from localhost (paul@localhost) by bofh.nohats.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id t2VEeuR2013179; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:40:56 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: bofh.nohats.ca: paul owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:40:56 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9F071A62-C101-4683-AEBD-71BDD4D2BFBC@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1503311039440.1147@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <20150330133237.21486.80504.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D7430231-BDAB-4766-8637-D4609634F3D3@gmail.com> <09B9FFB9-3C87-45F6-96CD-BB02B08C83F1@gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1503311001100.1147@bofh.nohats.ca> <9F071A62-C101-4683-AEBD-71BDD4D2BFBC@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/TfEbHFsEJ7Gqi2j9SpygeI4DlfE>
Cc: IETF IPsec <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Early code point assignment (was: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305-00.txt)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:41:02 -0000

On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Yoav Nir wrote:

>> Can we make it ENCR_CHACHA20_POLY1305 ?
>>
>> Currently IANA mostly has no CamelCase and it is kind of a C habbit to
>> have defines in CAPS :)
>
> I guess, although some of the names don’t quite work as identifiers: "AES-GCM with a 8 octet ICV” or "ENCR-AES-CCM_12”, which is surprisingly different in terms of dashes vs underscores than “ENCR_AES-CCM_8”.

And I've poked both PaulH and Tero to never ever add more names with a
"-" in it because that has to be replaced by "_" in C.

My apologies I wasn't very active at the time this happened :)

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email