[IPsec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: (with COMMENT)
Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 20 November 2018 21:45 UTC
Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DE9128BCC; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:45:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns@ietf.org, David Waltermire <david.waltermire@nist.gov>, ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org, david.waltermire@nist.gov, ipsec@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.89.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154275031487.29795.6995020474049388117.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:45:14 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/UYGhzjBy9h-_QGGpgogsFpi8XgM>
Subject: [IPsec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 21:45:15 -0000
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Perhaps it would be helpful to give an example of why A client using these configuration payloads will be able to request and receive Split DNS configurations using the INTERNAL_DNS_DOMAIN and INTERNAL_DNSSEC_TA configuration attributes. The client device can use the internal DNS server(s) for any DNS queries within the assigned domains. DNS queries for other domains SHOULD be sent to the regular external DNS server. DNS queries for other domains might not be sent to the regular external DNS server? I'm thinking of one, but I'm flat-out guessing.
- [IPsec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ie… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [IPsec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draf… Paul Wouters
- Re: [IPsec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draf… Paul Wouters
- Re: [IPsec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draf… Tero Kivinen
- Re: [IPsec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draf… Paul Wouters
- Re: [IPsec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draf… Tero Kivinen