Re: Concerns

[Bill Sommerfeld <[e-mail]>]

> I must say thay I have not found the ISAKMP supporters to be any
> less intransigent.

Hmm.  I got positive feedback about my inband-keying protocol fragment
from several people who you might expect are fairly firmly entrenched
in the ISAKMP camp.

> 3) I have been subscribed to this list for longer than I can remember, but I
> still have yet to see a formal list of *agreed upon* characteristics the
> group is looking for in a key management system.  ...

> 4) I am extremely concerned that we seem to have started yet another round
> of "let's reexamine what we're trying to do here." While a good idea in
> principle, we keep seem to do this, resulting in a constant moving of the
> goal posts. It is no wonder that we are having such difficulty reaching
> concensus!

These two items are in conflict.  I don't see how you can assemble a
concrete list of requirements *without* reexamining the goal of the
working group.

					- Bill