IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] [dane] IPSEC & DANE (RFC4025)

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Wed, 22 August 2012 00:13 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B52B21F855D; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.900, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tlrdLUg8Y17o; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AB821F8555; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so534676obb.31 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=DmRX5bxh+I5elS97TOY9xZWdn3eWz2/O/eieYbMaBNI=; b=Ccss5I0NONyFjvWDeIzPO+EI4NB1dbkqOoeNk045OsZz4brZw07jeMfSJR4B/aaltn W3fqq3p416VWlZqS1Z626kJMTtDjjw2LrLCiT99q3Ip2kC2zGdPhAfBY1zL3+6BMVKxP M9MZkhTieB7yThfGLBs0FeTTV/f2ypMKVWUwFBYOEJCkUcl1lMwb7htgUyw74eKlv6Uw Qi/ZDLhiYXwPWxpTsGtTlKu7fYI4+BDNie5DiXhviUlCcz0foMR9XrAOoS+hEBbriGrR 2f1vOGtUjbOA6b8rlOQt1iECtERLrIbRarkkOmzjiw+QVjYmRUbdjKULCHxgC9xPPxBC fPXQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.118.71 with SMTP id kk7mr14103401obb.81.1345594394582; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.80.10 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1208201333140.21383@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1207311128220.2140@bofh.nohats.ca> <4896.1343757791@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <alpine.LFD.2.02.1207311649030.5708@bofh.nohats.ca> <25977.1343775649@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CAMm+LwgvfqxgVLgqz9TdHbUBUGruziAoYFxg5+mndTiWUew9sw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.02.1208201333140.21383@bofh.nohats.ca>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:13:14 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwiw-5r5S7uu=ZUB-ktbZE_C7imG2ooFGJZOxN6AhyPW8Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@cypherpunks.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] [dane] IPSEC & DANE (RFC4025)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:13:15 -0000

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@cypherpunks.ca> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>
>> Is the answer to this problem possibly that DNS records to configure
>> IPSEC should go in the reverse DNS?
>
>
> Been there, done that in 1995, did not work.

When people make claims like that, I prefer to see a reason. Or are we
meant to take the fact that you could not make it work to mean that it
is impossible?



-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status