Re: replay field size, straw poll

yael@radguard.com Thu, 13 February 1997 13:22 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa11750; 13 Feb 97 8:22 EST
Received: from portal.ex.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05508; 13 Feb 97 8:22 EST
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id HAA04524 for ipsec-outgoing; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 07:45:50 -0500 (EST)
From: yael@radguard.com
Message-Id: <9702131150.AA22479@elgamal.radguard.com>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <yael@radguard.com>
To: ipsec@tis.com
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 13:54:21 +0000
Subject: Re: replay field size, straw poll
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.23)
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

straw poll

> Should AH and ESP both have a fixed size replay counter ? (Yes/No/Don't Care)

Yes

> If they have a fixed size counter, what size should it be? (32 bits/64 bits)

32 bits

> Should SHA-1 output be truncated to 128 bits from 160 bits ? (Yes/No/Don't
Care) 

Yes


Yael Dayan 
RADGUARD Ltd.