RE: IPsec Monitoring Mib

"Amit Chitale" <achitale@pace.stpp.soft.net> Fri, 26 April 2002 05:03 UTC

From: Amit Chitale <achitale@pace.stpp.soft.net>
To: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: RE: IPsec Monitoring Mib
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:45:26 +0530
Message-ID: <000801c1ecd8$ff7d3010$2864a8c0@apachi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <LGEPIDKIMCMEJMAHEKALKEBBCJAA.kcarr@nc.rr.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk

I agree with the view that Casey has shared on the list. We have only identified the MIB variables we want to attempt but haven't
moved on to the implementation as yet. I hope with Tim's reply interested people might just reply.

With Regards,
Amit Chitale

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
[mailto:owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com]On Behalf Of Casey Carr
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:11 AM
To: Tim Jenkins; 'Christopher R. Cook'; ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: RE: IPsec Monitoring Mib


We are interested in implementing an IPSec monitoring MIB but without one
being on standards track it is hard to justify the effort.  We were waiting
to see what came out of the disagreement on how to move forward because of
the competing MIBs.

Has anyone implemented any of these MIBs?  If so, how much of it?

Casey

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
[mailto:owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com]On Behalf Of Tim Jenkins
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 9:14 AM
To: 'Christopher R. Cook'; 'ipsec@lists.tislabs.com'
Subject: RE: IPsec Monitoring Mib


Here's my view.

Some time ago, Ted asked if there were any
deployments/interest/implementations of the series of MIB document written
by John Shriver and me, in an attempt to take them to last call.

The only response I recall was from the authors of another MIB. This lead to
a debate/discussion where it was suggested that that MIB replace the series
first mentioned. Nothing was resolved.

The bottom line is that there was little response on the mailing list, even
though I have received numerous private emails; none of those people posted
on the list to say that they were looking at/implementating/considering or
whatever the MIB.

I have also sent Ted emails asking him what his opinion of the status is,
and I've heard nothing back.

As far as changes to the documents themselves go, they are ready for last
call.

Tim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher R. Cook [mailto:ccook@quarrytech.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:35 PM
> To: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> Subject: IPsec Monitoring Mib
>
>
> Any status on Tim Jenkins's  IPsec Tunnel monitoring Mib ...
>
> Initial draft was to expire April 4, 2002 ....
>
> Are there any current WG's addressing monitoring for IPsec...
>
> Thanks
>

IPsec Monitoring Mib Christopher R. Cook
RE: IPsec Monitoring Mib Tim Jenkins
RE: IPsec Monitoring Mib Casey Carr
RE: IPsec Monitoring Mib Amit Chitale
RE: IPsec Monitoring Mib Christopher R. Cook