Complyence
rohit <rohit@trinc.com> Tue, 17 March 1998 06:31 UTC
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id BAA13214 for ipsec-outgoing; Tue, 17 Mar 1998 01:31:37 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19980317101348.006c1744@192.9.200.10>
X-Sender: rohit@192.9.200.10
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32)
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 10:13:48 +0500
To: ipsec@tis.com
From: rohit <rohit@trinc.com>
Subject: Complyence
Cc: kent@bbn.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
Hi All, Whether it is necessary ( MUST ) to implement ICMP PMTU processing , in order to make our implementation comply to the IpSec Architecture draft ? - Thanks ******************************************************************* -: Bridging The Gap Between Software And Hardware :- Rohit Aradhya Ph : (040)7742606 Rendzevous Onchip Pvt Ltd. Em : rohit@trinc.com First Floor, Plot No 14 New Vasavi Nagar, Karkhana Secunderbad -500019. India *******************************************************************
- Complyence rohit
- Re: Complyence Michael C. Richardson
- Re: Complyence Stephen Kent