Re: [IPsec] IPR Disclosure: Certicom Corporation's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks-04
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 10 May 2013 17:14 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B905E21F84D8 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2013 10:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kmBxXWlYkejV for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2013 10:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0BD421F84A9 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2013 10:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9582016D for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2013 13:26:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 6E6CF63A7E; Fri, 10 May 2013 13:13:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1DF639DF for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2013 13:13:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: ipsec@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20130509194111.30890.3049.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20130509194111.30890.3049.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3-dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 13:13:33 -0400
Message-ID: <1679.1368206013@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IPR Disclosure: Certicom Corporation's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks-04
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 17:14:48 -0000
I read: http://www.google.com/patents/US7215773 and I find: In RSA or Rabin signatures there are generally three routines, namely key pair generation, signature generation and signature verification. Validating an RSA public key (n, e) involves three steps. Firstly validate e, secondly validate n and thirdly validate e and n are consistent with each other. In order to validate the public exponent e, use of made of the fact that the exponent 2<=e<=2(k I can not speculate as to whether there is prior art, but it seems to match what we have been discussing. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
- [IPsec] IPR Disclosure: Certicom Corporation's St… IETF Secretariat
- Re: [IPsec] IPR Disclosure: Certicom Corporation'… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPsec] IPR Disclosure: Certicom Corporation'… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [IPsec] IPR Disclosure: Certicom Corporation'… Matthew Campagna
- Re: [IPsec] IPR Disclosure: Certicom Corporation'… Yoav Nir