[IPsec] Comment on draft-kampanakis-ml-kem-ikev2

"Bruckert, Leonie" <Leonie.Bruckert@secunet.com> Tue, 30 January 2024 11:40 UTC

Return-Path: <Leonie.Bruckert@secunet.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7358EC1CAF77 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 03:40:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=secunet.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05ngYD86AONc for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 03:40:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [62.96.220.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC691C14F5E8 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 03:40:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4360C2069C for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:40:04 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id akg8yv05vYbs for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:40:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mailout2.secunet.com (mailout2.secunet.com [62.96.220.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67FE9201AE for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:40:03 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 a.mx.secunet.com 67FE9201AE
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secunet.com; s=202301; t=1706614803; bh=vG+rD8SnYHbtVLsEnh0qZ7xTTQZw4z1CTAvSNhZ7n0g=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=LypIIJfzyZHC33KMvqgf6ZnbcFuG5Titz/85cX+skWUI8L0QtZRdOi8Iklnqedq4u wR0bbXZWnO2x5B6Ow1GZ23BeodfSWygLR8Tjuoui21Rv2pnQR3Ljis5uoqg+AzUCIh nyNl2UH5GB55KPF36JT/xx5h9T0kHsIiMnSbMrHOXMk/Hl/uswivwoDa+12F5vQjlj o7Sm7GeO7zYpPh7fjULDvwz3x8WUOdJ2TP48stnmiq1Z8qvg+lRPweZ7xE0QTyvbrQ HkP4qu8IznSKHvdSFgGJLtEgh+4TRXkguvN+UszSNZATia/RkDP1rIZJskrqEMIJfX 6mfbwxIOPM66Q==
Received: from cas-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.201]) by mailout2.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6430F80004A for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:40:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mbx-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.198) by cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:40:03 +0100
Received: from mbx-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.198) by mbx-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.198) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:40:02 +0100
Received: from mbx-essen-02.secunet.de ([fe80::fcaf:ee74:71ad:4eff]) by mbx-essen-02.secunet.de ([fe80::fcaf:ee74:71ad:4eff%8]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.035; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:40:02 +0100
From: "Bruckert, Leonie" <Leonie.Bruckert@secunet.com>
To: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Comment on draft-kampanakis-ml-kem-ikev2
Thread-Index: AdpTbguY61E/A+nBR8OJo8KotVdreQ==
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:40:02 +0000
Message-ID: <652d3010673246d7846fb6042e44d4d9@secunet.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_652d3010673246d7846fb6042e44d4d9secunetcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/WCAw-2Jhj7_BB0u0LgejJL226WI>
Subject: [IPsec] Comment on draft-kampanakis-ml-kem-ikev2
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:40:14 -0000

Thanks for setting up this draft!

Have you considered to align terminology with draft-ietf-pquip-pqt-hybrid-terminology? It defines a "PQ/T Hybrid Key Encapsulation Mechanism" as a "multi-algorithm KEM made up of two or more component KEM algorithms where at least one is a post-quantum algorithm and at least one is a traditional algorithm". This definition may not perfectly match how a hybrid KEM is done in IKEv2 as it is a sequential approach. However, I think it would be good to have a reference to the terminology draft.
Leonie