Re: [IPsec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6290 (3449)
Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 09 January 2013 13:47 UTC
Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5AB021F85B8 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 05:47:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gTep0GpySwwK for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 05:47:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-f53.google.com (mail-la0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10FE21F8235 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 05:46:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fn20so1829732lab.26 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 05:46:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2FFegeDBc6MZaqzTZrqRz789G9zIda17PmJQKsKoe/o=; b=SSi+eg0XIPvrK3oKKFoYORx77PYSHuwPQIGJfQhZkOzBnezzQmpjr0dTZiA4rN5JCt 2z+d2uo3v5cA/j1NXHAPEI1MQ3Nj7DtSZi/wogGjrvQLlWIaRYqnp8vcsDSVCGO5VFpz bjGGZepErmnx5MjP9hLoSAAmYawppF6m6aJVAuCnh7PiDWkNMvS8o/z+9iqJwM6JesBR 2Khxov9ttS+FbkYpCih3w76/H+NP/4WuED8pxNmiz8Fj25eOi6cMrTl5GDWG/kV50Dig SkxGBRpSrhLFL12Om6qjYQmDkMRcmsQTADz4NgnGQqUl1rjThwL/wETRzsOqdp7FOXal O/qg==
X-Received: by 10.112.23.136 with SMTP id m8mr27854400lbf.16.1357739211641; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 05:46:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.13] (85-250-110-45.bb.netvision.net.il. [85.250.110.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ee5sm24012872lbb.14.2013.01.09.05.46.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Jan 2013 05:46:50 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50ED74B2.1010905@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:46:26 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20130109121108.42527B1E002@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130109121108.42527B1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 05:47:58 -0800
Cc: valery@smyslov.net, ynir@checkpoint.com, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, ipsec@ietf.org, fd@cisco.com, psethi@cisco.com, turners@ieca.com, wierbows@us.ibm.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie
Subject: Re: [IPsec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6290 (3449)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:47:01 -0000
Similarly to #3448, this errata was also confirmed by WG discussion. Thanks, Yaron On 01/09/2013 02:11 PM, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6290, > "A Quick Crash Detection Method for the Internet Key Exchange Protocol (IKE)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6290&eid=3449 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net> > > Section: 4.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > o Protocol ID (1 octet) MUST be 1, as this message is related to an > IKE SA. > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > o Protocol ID (1 octet) MUST be 0. > > > Notes > ----- > RFC5996 (IKEv2) in section 3.10 while describing Protocol ID field in Notify Payload specifies that "If the SPI field is empty, this field MUST be sent as zero and MUST be ignored on receipt". As this RFC requires SPI field to be empty (later in section 4.1), Protocol ID should be zero to be consistent with RFC5996. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6290 (draft-ietf-ipsecme-failure-detection-08) > -------------------------------------- > Title : A Quick Crash Detection Method for the Internet Key Exchange Protocol (IKE) > Publication Date : June 2011 > Author(s) : Y. Nir, Ed., D. Wierbowski, F. Detienne, P. Sethi > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : IP Security Maintenance and Extensions > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
- [IPsec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6290 (3449) RFC Errata System
- Re: [IPsec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6290 (… Yaron Sheffer