Re: 10 years and no ubiquitous security

"The Purple Streak (Hilarie Orman)" <ho@alum.mit.edu> Tue, 19 March 2002 01:47 UTC

Received: from lists.tislabs.com (portal.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.101]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g2J1l9417363; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:47:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id UAA11816 Mon, 18 Mar 2002 20:15:10 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3C704AAE.20726500@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 17:28:30 -0700
From: "The Purple Streak (Hilarie Orman)" <ho@alum.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
CC: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: Re: 10 years and no ubiquitous security
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk

 William Allen Simpson <wsimpson@greendragon.com> said: 
  It was certain members of the WG who insisted we didn't need the 
  counter.  At least one has admitted he was wrong.  Are you ever going
to 
  admit you were?

I didn't realize that a call for admission had been previously issued.
Sure, I was wrong.  It was a surprise to me that protocols 
are not monotonic wrt non-security requirements when security is 
layered onto them.


Hilarie