IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-04

"Valery Smyslov" <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 17 December 2018 12:32 UTC

Return-Path: <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F224F128D68 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 04:32:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=1.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1FGUlkSv6GcK for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 04:32:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9180F1286E7 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 04:32:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id i26so9317535lfc.0 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 04:32:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=M+5awjmC2HpIoN95KT0zL4CXDYAiAWtiXkL6S+7/iOk=; b=FCjZexZ20QZzNOYUGW1hkMNfylj/vZhtzZOLV3exMR8gQ/2BWBDdwnYUq4nQPUrN/F CKxXE63ZdOvoG9eE2aKgVKZBFmgDclakmA+Wyz5lh8sSFmbGi+GxdI6InYT97TMY9Nnl 9cmZhaB0nyF219q0Ps84es8JaNFepDL5JXYL7rFBbks8/fK3/tyAxh73KIC+5mvXxCEJ D4oeZshDEzDQmgzEjNRCkiD1v6YoedUHxj+KZNXDG3p2zOlEZZsYyKkZNCh7IuRSD5aY D0vFiZbIuapMqy5qk2v6H7c5VpjsgradbzAKvuKcqUKpF34KNHOKesW3fVgsTBhX359S cTsg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=M+5awjmC2HpIoN95KT0zL4CXDYAiAWtiXkL6S+7/iOk=; b=l9Xuv1iNrJGeBWQmXXHl023I2WkIWuBjid/tLEMWvJxePCCI4riiwj7fSgdzd1Y0sg VHvI0KxBB8z6myqScuSwtNfscMpVB804qX1zVnUKI4loXXpxzT9JEJ5DKfO1Qhn4Dp5N 1ydseuB/mZ6EIfkZfZ6q6YrukuOhsXIuibw+OLbuUY5Tn8RFPbvCrahI+FHDESblX7sc TfC3Z7Xl8T+Vi3Dy0FhPwdCX+icTpcmbLiITKXucPRRbTzhx/7Jh37BAPJbCX4cUAdMX KBEegscPDgj63thwPVH3y7NiKD2LkJO2ou2YvWYten6LdugqmtnU8HD7qc9weiQTeCsP GQeQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbKOT38Gv8K/OwAIWGFOusTMdqqN9H7gUO08twFWLspHz0Rmkxt PNqED7HSUrAMe0cgs1LBkprHxypZ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WJ76WbRnaiy50kEHB2OFwNvPEQopEAoixrN5znXXCnPqf9fGs63yYDTpSBKNHu7MRXECqaaw==
X-Received: by 2002:a19:d90c:: with SMTP id q12mr6940583lfg.24.1545049927361; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 04:32:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from buildpc ([82.138.51.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z15-v6sm2941320ljb.9.2018.12.17.04.32.06 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Dec 2018 04:32:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "'Hammell, Jonathan F'" <Jonathan.Hammell@cyber.gc.ca>, ipsec@ietf.org
References: <20181213174027.091BD1200B3@ietfa.amsl.com> <01fa01d4937b$dd4edaa0$97ec8fe0$@gmail.com> <20181214201028.74527130E77@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20181214201028.74527130E77@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:31:45 +0300
Message-ID: <02f501d49604$795a8cc0$6c0fa640$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJCuH6YkCsi91nYYVdJKq3SgNeIfgHL3FRqAafpUVekivlrcA==
Content-Language: ru
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/WdMO3bt491gwsyMbX78QRtxsCPc>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-04
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 12:32:11 -0000

> > I don't think the proposed change is justified. The requirement language (MAY, SHOULD, MUST etc.) it IETF
> documents is usually used in
> > protocol descriptions when some actions are required (or prohibited) to achieve interoperability. Section
> "Upgrade procedure" is not
> > concerned with the protocol itself, it is just a recommended algorithm for upgrading some system for using
> PPK. It is not the only algorithm
> > possible. And it isn't concerned with interoperability of different protocol implementations. So, I'd leave the
> text as is.
> 
> We agree with your interpretation that a capital SHOULD might not be appropriate, but we still feel a
> lowercase "should" in place of "may" will encourage more administrators to complete the upgrade procedure.

OK, I think it's a good suggestion.

Thank you,
Valery.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email