Re: [IPsec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ipsecme-traffic-visibility-05.txt

Jack Kohn <kohn.jack@gmail.com> Wed, 24 June 2009 22:56 UTC

Return-Path: <kohn.jack@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99133A6D83 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gUgzyipzlNgr for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f198.google.com (mail-qy0-f198.google.com [209.85.221.198]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B3B3A6C80 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so1544607qyk.29 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bQeinfl4KzgNSGJPs+huOgBGwYdle0Zhjpr7dW5aA+U=; b=PPtErCQ0o6nJmyJ/Vf4z02TKkpvj5Zrn2GdO0M1Fc1KXkf5Dw7u3MBbK+ghnmT3QCq UZVL/LB0HX0+c1X2pwsl4sfjLLQCDTYBNKfbS9j5q0UKzMVTTxgy66zc0raOgxlOGtU/ IMyJ2KRqK4J5X96fHfHrkGr/n59ao9Suy82Wk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=FGPNTWp1tKSNyeCvS5zmHM7XXVkLescGZXGioroPVztKGIPjG6PbC5Zih/py2WcTzK NyxnPznm3mjROPj3iDb8jXpHXKY5GyQqGKe8M4OyijEZju0F4fBeNmQ74IL3mwmOmbdL D8b3d8xs9s2uElKMCbZn50235PfcEr2BH9jzA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.86.149 with SMTP id s21mr1989402vcl.79.1245884142077; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC8E8ABC0DFA9@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
References: <20090624154501.888063A6CBE@core3.amsl.com> <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC8E8ABC0DFA9@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:25:42 +0530
Message-ID: <dc8fd0140906241555k53964f46m2e20132442bfc33d@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jack Kohn <kohn.jack@gmail.com>
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e6476110b8480c046d2001de"
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ipsecme-traffic-visibility-05.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:56:06 -0000

Yaron,

I think its ready for the WG LC.

Jack

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> we've done a lot of work on this document as a group, and it may well be
> ready to go through WG Last Call. However it did go through 4 revisions
> since San Francisco. So before we proceed, I'd like to ask if anybody is
> seeing showstopper issues with the draft in its current form. In which case
> we'll need to work on this draft some more before sending it to LC. If
> there
> are small issues though, we can defer them to the last call process.
>
> Please respond to the list, or to Paul and myself.
>
> Thanks,
>         Yaron
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of
> > Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 18:45
> > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> > Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
> > Subject: [IPsec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ipsecme-traffic-visibility-05.txt
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> > directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions
> > Working Group of the IETF.
> >
> >
> >       Title           : Wrapped ESP for Traffic Visibility
> >       Author(s)       : K. Grewal, et al.
> >       Filename        : draft-ietf-ipsecme-traffic-visibility-05.txt
> >       Pages           : 13
> >       Date            : 2009-06-24
> >
> > This document describes the Wrapped Encapsulating Security
> > Payload (WESP) protocol, which builds on top of Encapsulating
> > Security Payload (ESP) [RFC4303] and is designed to allow
> > intermediate devices to ascertain if ESP-NULL [RFC2410] is being
> > employed and hence inspect the IPsec packets for network
> > monitoring and access control functions.  Currently in the IPsec
> > standard, there is no way to differentiate between ESP
> > encryption and ESP NULL encryption by simply examining a packet.
> > This poses certain challenges to the intermediate devices that
> > need to deep inspect the packet before making a decision on what
> > should be done with that packet (Inspect and/or Allow/Drop). The
> > mechanism described in this document can be used to easily
> > disambiguate ESP-NULL from ESP encrypted packets, without
> > compromising on the security provided by ESP.
> >
> > A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> >
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipsecme-traffic-visibility-
> > 05.txt
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
> > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
> > Internet-Draft.
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>
>