Re: Looking for statement of patent issues re ISAKMP/Oakley

"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> Wed, 11 March 1998 22:33 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id RAA23052 for ipsec-outgoing; Wed, 11 Mar 1998 17:33:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199803112246.RAA07999@jekyll.piermont.com>
To: Kenneth_Durazzo@BayNetworks.COM
cc: Bob Baldwin <baldwin@RSA.COM>, 'Paul Koning' <pkoning@xedia.com>, ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: Looking for statement of patent issues re ISAKMP/Oakley
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 11 Mar 1998 09:57:16 PST." <3.0.32.19980311095711.00723b14@sc-mail2.corpwest.baynetworks.com>
Reply-To: perry@piermont.com
X-Reposting-Policy: redistribute only with permission
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 17:46:00 -0500
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

Kenneth Durazzo writes:
> No flame.. it would just be nice to be able to implement good technology
> for use in the public domain without "paying through the nose" for it
> (read: standardization) which would be good for all.

Well, I'll point out that Diffie-Hellman itself, and Diffie-Hellman
based keying (i.e. El Gamal) are both out of patent these days.

Also, the RSA patent is expiring in about 700 days if I'm not mistaken.

Perry