Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)

EKR <ekr@terisa.com> Wed, 19 February 1997 17:42 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id MAA25293 for ipsec-outgoing; Wed, 19 Feb 1997 12:42:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199702191743.JAA14968@itech.terisa.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: itech.terisa.com: Host kmac.terisa.COM didn't use HELO protocol
To: Bob Monsour <rmonsour@earthlink.net>
cc: perry@piermont.com, ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Feb 1997 07:17:54 PST." <3.0.32.19970219071752.0094a7e0@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 09:47:37 -0800
From: EKR <ekr@terisa.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

> At 09:22 AM 2/19/97 -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> >I see you haven't heard of SSL, eh?
> 
> I am very aware of SSL (and it provides support for compressing prior to
> encrypting).
Well, sort of:

There is a socket for compression to be plugged into. There are
no defined compression plugs (other than null) and I don't expect
there to be any for some time.

-Ekr