[IPsec] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-intermediate-09: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 02 March 2022 01:39 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AA43A09A1; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 17:39:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-intermediate@ietf.org, ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org, ipsec@ietf.org, ynir.ietf@gmail.com, ynir.ietf@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.46.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <164618518036.17933.17750032097227119414@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 17:39:40 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/XY4DhGesR3eEuod6mwNc2L89H_k>
Subject: [IPsec] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-intermediate-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 01:39:41 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-intermediate-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-intermediate/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A few editorial items: ** Section 1. Editorial. s/If size of/If the size of/ ** Section 1. Editorial. Per “… that may interfere badly with some network devices”, can something more precise than “interfere badly” be used? Perhaps: OLD: That may interfere badly with some network devices NEW Which has been shown to cause operational challenge in certain network configurations and devices. ** Section 3.3.2. Editorial. Per “… because peers generally are unaware in which form other side has received them”, there is a missing word here. ** Section 3.3.2. Editorial. s/After n-th exchange/After the n-th exchange/ **Section 3.3.2. Editorial. OLD The IntAuth_[i/r]*A chunk lasts from ... NEW The IntAuth [i/r]*A chunk consists of the sequence of octets from ... ** Section 8. Typo. s/regadless/regardless/
- [IPsec] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-iet… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [IPsec] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft… Valery Smyslov