RE: SPI question

Stephen Waters <Stephen.Waters@digital.com> Thu, 28 May 1998 10:21 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id GAA25606 for ipsec-outgoing; Thu, 28 May 1998 06:21:21 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <250F9C8DEB9ED011A14D08002BE4F64C01959175@wade.reo.dec.com>
From: Stephen Waters <Stephen.Waters@digital.com>
To: "Srinivas. B. Kulkarni" <srinu@trinc.com>
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
Subject: RE: SPI question
Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 11:33:03 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

Hello Amal,


Srinu>> The initiator will generate an SPI, which will be used as the
SPI
value for INBOUND SA at initiator side and OUTBOUND SA at the responder
side.
...
Srinu>> OK, responder in response to the  initiator proposals will
select
one of them, and then he(responder) will generate an SPI value for
his(responder) INBOUND SA and send it to the initiator to use it to
identify his(initiator) OUTBOUND SA.


Waters> Isn't this the wrong way round?  If the initiator is setting up
an SA, it is probably because
Waters> there is a packet waiting to go OUT.
Waters>
Waters> It seems more logical to me that the initiator should specify
the SPI for the Initiator's OUTBOUND and
Waters> the responder's INBOUND, and that the responder should create
another SPI for the responder's 
Waters> OUTBOUND and the initiator's INBOUND.
Waters>
Waters> This is all guess-work though - I haven't read it anywhere.  I
know, you can tell :)
Waters> Cheers, Steve.