Re: [IPsec] Will it be a good idea if we join in meetecho?

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 06 November 2012 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6830921F81FE for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 06:20:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fvcQQ+J3WILD for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 06:20:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27AD521F8685 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 06:20:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-6045.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-6045.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.96.69]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA6EKZ4H017397 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Nov 2012 07:20:36 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <2A09E170-7C8E-4243-8069-297A9FFBFB18@checkpoint.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 09:20:40 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AB739B2A-19BF-4E06-859D-3FA3DA56581A@vpnc.org>
References: <C9B5F12337F6F841B35C404CF0554ACB2B9A4F60@szxeml546-mbx.china.huawei.com> <2A09E170-7C8E-4243-8069-297A9FFBFB18@checkpoint.com>
To: "Will Liu (Shucheng)" <liushucheng@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Will it be a good idea if we join in meetecho?
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 14:20:42 -0000

On Nov 5, 2012, at 11:09 PM, Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> wrote:

> Too late now that our meeting's over.
> 
> 
> On Nov 5, 2012, at 9:40 PM, Will Liu (Shucheng) wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>  
>> I see that several WGs are in here. http://ietf85.conf.meetecho.com/
>> Do you think it would be a good idea that we also join this?

I'm confused as well. What value would there be to join Meetecho after the meeting?

--Paul Hoffman