Re: [IPsec] New PAKE Criteria draft posted

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 26 March 2010 05:34 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A363A67A7 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pszmznQgW1Q0 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C043A6862 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so2189061fga.13 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xv0+EKWUVF9MiArkcosApfveUM5HcTOC1s8XjaMOWfE=; b=NQicnLndrfiOGb+yMg/qYapA8v/CzuP1r50hvu1FDJzW54sDMfpc3yOKUYmZMEToGe CgY8q8XDrI80l9qUnak1yzTtmY3ggmkrJFelefa8ve2cqZTwdzAzfE6h33EJp2rEtlJW bLTjqBOPEP6AnPYuMsuUcOqAuHNgGDkBGTlhI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KRdnoWN7qTmGNl5FOmgTtDEOCANHFO7yVdOGVbTYejZ3+dM10eaoy/RhOAdKeidIX+ kG1yY+5a4lOLpyuNqLVSQs9+FUwOW87hqPqoJvcKxIc5+66ZWVUksbMWF3z1w7Cz0rTZ Py8d/7GrK50eY9jSldup2KoX+LIJk9o/dy2qE=
Received: by 10.87.73.30 with SMTP id a30mr30714fgl.64.1269581704187; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.117.42.149] (192.117.42.149.static.012.net.il [192.117.42.149]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d6sm3420220fga.23.2010.03.25.22.35.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BAC4797.8040603@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:35:19 +0300
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SeongHan Shin <seonghan.shin@aist.go.jp>
References: <4BAB06D4.3030907@gmail.com> <a8d6c01a1003251107x7cc6e303g5e105f547788a58e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a8d6c01a1003251107x7cc6e303g5e105f547788a58e@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>, Kazukuni Kobara <k-kobara@aist.go.jp>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] New PAKE Criteria draft posted
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 05:34:46 -0000

Hi Shin,

Yes. For the typical remote access VPN, EAP is typically more useful. 
Note that there is still need for strong password-based mutual 
authentication EAP methods - but their home is the EMU working group.

In addition, the IPsecME has another charter item designed to fit such 
EAP methods (such as the future EAP-AugPAKE :-) into IKEv2.

Please see again the group's charter, 
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ipsecme/charters.

Thanks,
	Yaron

On 25.3.2010 20:07, SeongHan Shin wrote:
> Dear Yaron Sheffer,
>
> I have one question about the draft.
>
> draft-sheffer-ipsecme-pake-criteria-02.txt says in Page 4
> “This document is limited to the use of password-based authentication to
> achieve trust between gateways”
>
> Is this a consensus of this WG?
>
> Best regards,
> Shin
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com
> <mailto:yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     after the good discussion in Anaheim, and with the help of comments
>     received on and off the list, I have updated the PAKE Criteria draft
>     and posted it as
>     http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-sheffer-ipsecme-pake-criteria-02.txt.
>
>     I have added a number of criteria, clarified others, and added
>     numbering (SEC1-SEC6, IPR1-IPR3 etc.).
>
>     Thanks,
>         Yaron
>     _______________________________________________
>     IPsec mailing list
>     IPsec@ietf.org <mailto:IPsec@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>
>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> SeongHan Shin
> Research Center for Information Security (RCIS),
> National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST),
> Room no. 1003, Akihabara Daibiru 10F,
> 1-18-13, Sotokannda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0021 Japan
> Tel : +81-3-5298-2722
> Fax : +81-3-5298-4522
> E-mail : seonghan.shin@aist.go.jp <mailto:seonghan.shin@aist.go.jp>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------