Re: Reminder: Release 0.4 of my Linux IPSEC code is out.
Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com> Mon, 03 February 1997 02:32 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa00514; 2 Feb 97 21:32 EST
Received: from portal.ex.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19508; 2 Feb 97 21:32 EST
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id VAA12782 for ipsec-outgoing; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 21:13:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970202153751.009b8540@pop3hub.is.chrysler.com>
Reply-To: rgm3@chrysler.com
X-Sender: rgm3@pop3hub.is.chrysler.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 1997 20:15:33 -0500
To: ji@hol.gr, linux-ipsec@clinet.fi, ipsec@tis.com, ietf-sectest@toad.com
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com>
Subject: Re: Reminder: Release 0.4 of my Linux IPSEC code is out.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
At 09:29 AM 1/29/97 +0200, John Ioannidis wrote: > >Please note that in some countries such as the USA, it is unlawful for a >citizen of that country to provide technical assistance "with the intent to >aid a foreign person in the development or manufacture outside the United >States" of >"Encryption Items". I think there is a partial 'out'. If a US company is attempting to interoperate with your code and fails, they can point to the part of a public specification related to the failure. Such as our implementations failed to interoperate related to section n.m.o of rfc wxyz. But I am not a lawyer, only heard this explaination 3rd hand from a lawyer. Robert Moskowitz Chrysler Corporation (810) 758-8212
- Reminder: Release 0.4 of my Linux IPSEC code is o… John Ioannidis
- Re: Reminder: Release 0.4 of my Linux IPSEC code … Robert Moskowitz