IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] replacing PSKs: CFRG and PAKE

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 12 December 2018 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB25A1312DB for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 13:36:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jpecxaqV1Gll for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 13:36:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E74B21312D9 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 13:36:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CFA20089 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 16:36:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id B79E2DF7; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 16:36:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54CE65 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 16:36:34 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <201C4873-318D-4AD1-A469-2F8854CAE623@gmail.com>
References: <25207.1544136532@localhost> <026601d49061$8809ad30$981d0790$@gmail.com> <29587.1544482818@localhost> <20181210231958.GC15561@localhost> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1812101846010.29141@bofh.nohats.ca> <20181211001622.GD15561@localhost> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1812102042330.22448@bofh.nohats.ca> <035701d49149$71640f10$542c2d30$@gmail.com> <2503.1544530985@localhost> <037201d4914f$dee01ba0$9ca052e0$@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1812112033200.2103@bofh.nohats.ca> <048601d491f9$72824050$5786c0f0$@gmail.com> <201C4873-318D-4AD1-A469-2F8854CAE623@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 16:36:34 -0500
Message-ID: <22731.1544650594@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/Yi-MOEgRx_N2vdsKvpNjV3QCqNA>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] replacing PSKs: CFRG and PAKE
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:36:38 -0000

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don’t think the idea is to replace a 128-bit PSK derived from a properly
> seeded DRBG with “ip5ecmeRockz!” using a PAKE.

Please! The official PSK is "makemetastegoat"

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status