IETF Logo Mail Archive

FW: is manual keying mandatory

Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com> Thu, 19 March 1998 17:47 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id MAA19463 for ipsec-outgoing; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:47:38 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=TimeStep_Corpora%l=TSNTSRV2-980319175825Z-1886@tsntsrv2.timestep.com>
From: Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com>
To: "IPSEC Mailing List (E-mail)" <ipsec@tis.com>
Subject: FW: is manual keying mandatory
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:58:25 -0500
X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.995.52
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk


>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Dan McDonald [SMTP:danmcd@eng.Sun.COM]
>Sent:	Wednesday, March 18, 1998 5:18 PM
>To:	Roy Pereira
>Subject:	Re: is manual keying mandatory
>
>> Is manual keying a required feature of IPSec?  
>
>Absolutely!
>
>It always has been, and always will be.
>
>> In other words, if you do not support manual keying then are you
>> IPSec-compliant or not?
>
>I would say you are not fully compliant.  How much this will _really matter_
>might be the subject of some debate, but if you don't do manual keying,
>you're not fully compliant.
>
>> There seams to bea bit of confusion surrounding this topic and I would like
>> to see what people think.
>
>We've pounded this one into the ground a million times, folks.  Let's spend
>our time on more important topics, huh?  :)
>
>Dan

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status