Re: ANX IPSEC bakeoff
Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com> Tue, 11 February 1997 15:01 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa05329; 11 Feb 97 10:01 EST
Received: from portal.ex.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12320; 11 Feb 97 10:01 EST
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id JAA17590 for ipsec-outgoing; Tue, 11 Feb 1997 09:51:13 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970211084836.009117e0@dilbert.is.chrysler.com>
Reply-To: rgm3@chrysler.com
X-Sender: rgm3@dilbert.is.chrysler.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 08:54:20 -0500
To: Kent Fitch <Kent.Fitch@its.csiro.au>, ipsec@tis.com
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com>
Subject: Re: ANX IPSEC bakeoff
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
At 05:17 PM 2/11/97 +1100, you wrote: >> At 04:44 PM 2/8/97 -0800, Derrell Piper wrote: >> >There was clear consensus at the ANX IPSEC bakeoff last week to ... > >Are there any details available of what happened at this bakeoff? > They will be posted early next week. We first want a group review of our report and consensus signoff by all parties on what we learned. Our lawyers tell us this is the way of business ;) Robert Moskowitz Chrysler Corporation (810) 758-8212
- ANX IPSEC bakeoff Kent Fitch
- Re: ANX IPSEC bakeoff Robert Moskowitz