Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents
Per Unell <pu@sectra.se> Tue, 18 June 1996 19:28 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03056; 18 Jun 96 15:28 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03051; 18 Jun 96 15:28 EDT
Received: from neptune.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18554; 18 Jun 96 15:28 EDT
Received: from neptune.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa08157; 18 Jun 96 15:13 EDT
Received: from relay.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa08141; 18 Jun 96 15:08 EDT
Received: by relay.tis.com; id PAA13544; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 15:10:10 -0400
Received: from sol.tis.com(192.33.112.100) by relay.tis.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma013539; Tue, 18 Jun 96 15:09:48 -0400
Received: from relay.tis.com by tis.com (4.1/SUN-5.64) id AA17922; Tue, 18 Jun 96 15:09:41 EDT
Received: by relay.tis.com; id PAA13533; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 15:09:40 -0400
Received: from mn3.swip.net(192.71.180.33) by relay.tis.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma013526; Tue, 18 Jun 96 15:09:13 -0400
Received: by mn3.swip.net (8.7.5/2.01) id SAA09134; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 18:59:56 GMT
Received: from desmond.sectra.se by jeeves.sectra.se (4.1/KTH-1.1+Sectra-1.4) id AA04968; Tue, 18 Jun 96 20:45:03 +0200
Received: by desmond.sectra.se (1.38.193.5/HP=16.2/Sectra=0.1) id AA24642; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 20:44:36 +0200
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Per Unell <pu@sectra.se>
Message-Id: <9606182044.ZM24640@desmond.sectra.se>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 20:44:36 +0000
References: <199606180329.UAA02531@servo.qualcomm.com> <9606180023.ZM11634@butthead.smallworks.com> <96Jun18.115333edt.18450-2@janus.border.com>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.0 06sep94)
To: ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Orig-Sender: ipsec-approval@neptune.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
On Jun 18, 11:51am, C. Harald Koch wrote: > Subject: Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents > > > Subject: Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents > > > >Filed: Sep. 13, 1994 > > > >Filed: Jan. 19, 1994 > > The patent also states "continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 28,437, Mar 3, > 1993, abandoned"; this is the important "first date", according to the > lawyers. The papers below are after this date, and won't count as prior art. > > (Anyone from that lunch BOF want to testify? <grin>) > I Just looked up the oldest version of the requirement specification for our KryptoLan system that I could find. It is dated May. 27 1991 and includes IP and Ethernet encryption and is based on the IEEE 802.10 Draft 1 dated december 1989. Sure beats 1993 ... /PU
- UUNET Network Encryption Patents C. Harald Koch
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Jack De Winter
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents John Ioannidis
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents C. Harald Koch
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Per Unell
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents John Gilmore
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Robert Moskowitz
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Steven Bellovin
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents MarkVon
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents PALAMBER.US.ORACLE.COM
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents PALAMBER.US.ORACLE.COM
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Perry E. Metzger
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Carl F. Muckenhirn
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Robert Moskowitz
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Jim Thompson
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Perry E. Metzger
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Carl F. Muckenhirn
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Jim Thompson
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Perry E. Metzger
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Phil Karn
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Phil Karn
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Jim Thompson
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Steven Bellovin
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Joe Tardo
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Jonathan M. Smith
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Stephen Kent
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Stephen Kent
- Re: UPenn Network Encryption Patent John Gilmore
- Re: UPenn Network Encryption Patent Jonathan M. Smith