Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents
Jack De Winter <jack@wildbear.on.ca> Mon, 17 June 1996 17:51 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23323; 17 Jun 96 13:51 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23319; 17 Jun 96 13:51 EDT
Received: from neptune.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12831; 17 Jun 96 13:51 EDT
Received: from neptune.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa12454; 17 Jun 96 13:37 EDT
Received: from relay.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa12439; 17 Jun 96 13:33 EDT
Received: by relay.tis.com; id NAA12484; Mon, 17 Jun 1996 13:34:57 -0400
Received: from sol.tis.com(192.33.112.100) by relay.tis.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma012481; Mon, 17 Jun 96 13:34:32 -0400
Received: from relay.tis.com by tis.com (4.1/SUN-5.64) id AA22971; Mon, 17 Jun 96 13:34:27 EDT
Received: by relay.tis.com; id NAA12478; Mon, 17 Jun 1996 13:34:27 -0400
Received: from unknown(199.246.132.198) by relay.tis.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma012476; Mon, 17 Jun 96 13:34:23 -0400
Received: by lacroix.wildbear.on.ca from localhost (router,SLmailNT V3.0 alpha 1); Mon, 17 Jun 96 13:35:33 Eastern Daylight Time
Received: by lacroix.wildbear.on.ca from wildside.wildbear.on.ca (199.246.132.193::mail daemon,SLmailNT V3.0 alpha 1); Mon, 17 Jun 96 13:35:32 Eastern Daylight Time
X-Sender: "Jack De Winter" <jack@wildbear.on.ca>
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.1.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 13:35:22 -0400
To: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@border.com>, ipsec@tis.com
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Jack De Winter <jack@wildbear.on.ca>
Subject: Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents
Message-Id: <19960617133533.00c6ce14.in@lacroix.wildbear.on.ca>
X-Orig-Sender: ipsec-approval@neptune.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
>It has been brought to my attention that UUNET Technologies has a pair of >patents covering network encryption. The patents are very broad, and >basically cover anything that selectively encrypts datagrams based on >source/destination information. This would automatically cover all >implementations of the IPsec protocols. > >UUNET's legal staff have stated their intent to begin actively pursuing >these patents, beginning this summer. It is my understanding that their >licensing terms are quite reasonable. However, this patent has (obvious) >implications for everyone here, and so I bring it to your attention. would some kind member of the list be able to check into this and get some more detailed information as to the ramifications of this protocol in light of these patents? regards, Jack ------------------------------------------------- Jack De Winter - Wildbear Consulting, Inc. (519) 576-3873 Lacroix: Well, I must be the devil to you. Nicolah: No, not the devil Lacroix. Lacroix: What then? Nicolah: My closest friend. In Memorium - Forever Knight, "Last Knight", Last Words.
- UUNET Network Encryption Patents C. Harald Koch
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Jack De Winter
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents John Ioannidis
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents C. Harald Koch
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Per Unell
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents John Gilmore
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Robert Moskowitz
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Steven Bellovin
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents MarkVon
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents PALAMBER.US.ORACLE.COM
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents PALAMBER.US.ORACLE.COM
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Perry E. Metzger
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Carl F. Muckenhirn
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Robert Moskowitz
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Jim Thompson
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Perry E. Metzger
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Carl F. Muckenhirn
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Jim Thompson
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Perry E. Metzger
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Phil Karn
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Phil Karn
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Jim Thompson
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Steven Bellovin
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Joe Tardo
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Jonathan M. Smith
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Stephen Kent
- Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents Stephen Kent
- Re: UPenn Network Encryption Patent John Gilmore
- Re: UPenn Network Encryption Patent Jonathan M. Smith