IETF Logo Mail Archive

[IPsec] FW: New Version Notification for draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-00.txt

Valery Smyslov <svan@elvis.ru> Wed, 06 May 2020 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <svan@elvis.ru>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB893A07F8 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 May 2020 06:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J8_b6Rdios-U for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 May 2020 06:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from akmail.elvis.ru (akmail.elvis.ru [82.138.51.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B724E3A0ABB for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 May 2020 06:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kmail2.elvis.ru ([93.188.44.210]) by akmail.elvis.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <svan@elvis.ru>) id 1jWKJM-0000Pr-P9 for ipsec@ietf.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 16:42:08 +0300
Received: from mail16.office.elvis.ru ([10.111.1.29] helo=mail.office.elvis.ru) by kmail2.elvis.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <svan@elvis.ru>) id 1jWKJM-0006eQ-B6 for ipsec@ietf.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 16:42:08 +0300
Received: from MAIL16.office.elvis.ru (10.111.1.29) by MAIL16.office.elvis.ru (10.111.1.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1779.2; Wed, 6 May 2020 16:42:08 +0300
Received: from buildpc (10.111.10.33) by MAIL16.office.elvis.ru (10.111.1.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.1779.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 6 May 2020 16:42:08 +0300
From: Valery Smyslov <svan@elvis.ru>
To: IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
References: <158877219792.32315.17792974305291155977@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158877219792.32315.17792974305291155977@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 16:42:11 +0300
Message-ID: <030201d623ac$24b3ab70$6e1b0250$@elvis.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJ6pIE+fZ0cGV5siaEuPO7ai8p3mKdSDlhQ
Content-Language: ru
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFilteredBySendConnector: MAIL16.office.elvis.ru
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: MAIL16.office.elvis.ru
X-Spam-Scanner: Rspamd work in kmail2.elvis.ru, WHITELIST
X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 1
X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean
X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, disabled by settings
X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: Clean, bases: 2020/02/16 23:24:00
X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.3.30, bases: 2020/02/16 18:54:00 #14771046
X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: Clean, skipped
X-Spam-Scanner: Rspamd work in akmail.elvis.ru, WHITELIST
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/_PBcVwscoxKQ8lUNMktXejrUjrM>
Subject: [IPsec] FW: New Version Notification for draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 13:42:22 -0000

Hi,

following the suggestions from Tom and Paul I've prepared a 8229bis draft.
It incorporates all the clarifications from ipsecme-tcp-guidelines draft.

Comments are very welcome.

Regards,
Valery.

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2020 4:37 PM
To: Valery Smyslov
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-00.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Valery Smyslov and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis
Revision:	00
Title:		TCP Encapsulation of IKE and IPsec Packets
Document date:	2020-05-06
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		30
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-00
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis


Abstract:
   This document describes a method to transport Internet Key Exchange
   Protocol (IKE) and IPsec packets over a TCP connection for traversing
   network middleboxes that may block IKE negotiation over UDP.  This
   method, referred to as "TCP encapsulation", involves sending both IKE
   packets for Security Association establishment and Encapsulating
   Security Payload (ESP) packets over a TCP connection.  This method is
   intended to be used as a fallback option when IKE cannot be
   negotiated over UDP.

   TCP encapsulation for IKE and IPsec was defined in [RFC8229].  This
   document updates specification for TCP encapsulation by including
   additional calarifications obtained during implementation and
   deployment of this method.  This documents makes RFC8229 obsolete.

                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email