Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-17.txt
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Fri, 17 February 2017 02:10 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D89129559 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:10:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8JYQWy4MLBDD for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:09:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6EEE12946E for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:09:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vPc0z5LY1zD4K for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 03:09:55 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1487297395; bh=VDbawKiDe1SRjB7IT65k+OTS0ZCGkMcZUUr9oiYD/Os=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=jxDKTWd8b55mr+pwJaY1Baa9cacdT2YJuCnQT2fGdLoV1OVCByIz2McGn5RPPDhuP DRQzTemnzmyuPEmOE1OE60fI31E9fQD1X/tgQnmzzkEURhMRk6KJGiH70l705DfASE 8zph9aVSZjp8RaVN9KNHjAP5R+zs6FyJnsScoSzA=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9WLweqWRc1_b for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 03:09:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 03:09:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 223A52DEFF3; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:09:52 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca 223A52DEFF3
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE1641DA420 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:09:51 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:09:51 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <148729687633.21886.13208794224238871615.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1702162101460.2979@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <148729687633.21886.13208794224238871615.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LRH 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/_avBjqgx5-7HQJe3Ns1f08ZxLJI>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-17.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 02:10:01 -0000
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-17 This version only has textual changes for clarity: - Moved Section as per Pete Resnick's suggestion - Incorporated grammar and typo fixes suggested by Pete Resnick - Complete the g**a and g**b swap that Yoav noticed. - A few of my own grammar fixes (eg remove the use of "we") I did wonder if the introduction of these 4307bis and 7321bis should perhaps reference each other in the Introduction section instead of just saying "does not apply to [the other doc stuff] Paul
- [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis… internet-drafts
- Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc430… Paul Wouters