Return-Path: X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFAF21F8A0C for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:39:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.582 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UO3SPUWEWnOF for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:39:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFCB21F8A08 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:39:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.34.150]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r2DNdZPu004242; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 01:39:35 +0200 X-CheckPoint: {51410D63-0-1B221DC2-2FFFF} Received: from IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.2.54]) by DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.3.95]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 01:39:35 +0200 From: Yoav Nir To: Paul Wouters Thread-Topic: [IPsec] IKE fragmentation Thread-Index: AQHOH/pQdHmEPMd7P0SMbddmnpEj3pijlQIAgACRiAA= Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 23:39:34 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20799.34490.611737.922474@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <294A12724CB849D2A33F7F80CC82426A@buildpc> <4C4F5DE0838E4DCFBAE31A02D7ED5D33@buildpc> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.31.20.156] x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "" , Valery Smyslov , Tero Kivinen Subject: Re: [IPsec] IKE fragmentation X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 23:39:41 -0000 On Mar 13, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2013, Valery Smyslov wrote: >=20 >> Or are you talking about the fictional IETF document (not yet written) >> describing existing IKEv1 fragmentation? Probably it is better that >> the authors of that solution document it. >=20 > I don't think any IKEv1 documents will ever be written again? :) I think that if we make this a working group document, we should add an App= endix that will be informational and describe what people are doing for IKE= v1, including the VendorID and the payload identifier "appropriated" for fr= agments. When I implemented this I used the source of Wireshark to figure out how th= e protocol worked. Pretty poor reverse engineering, but it produced somethi= ng that interoperates. Yoav=