Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-labeled-ipsec-05.txt
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 05 May 2021 01:30 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFD13A1DEA for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 May 2021 18:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2hm0SvzY0JMe for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 May 2021 18:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E1E13A1DE7 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 May 2021 18:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FZfL046xNzF4Y; Wed, 5 May 2021 03:30:48 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1620178248; bh=HVi5EwSof/O7Yf35+RCnTqjBN9EBKnjziZgrFrBYvbw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=iGHOjrJbACIEEn8uauJzzVzXECwsZS2naLr+3gPRuJBNNMqkf5NKVJF0FIDxhDC2g RFV88DYCZGxatcWS2TNysn86UVxW9pw66FD7GutgMTWrsBSwHoXIRzC5B3MxDGJd80 xb1k6QYBidNpDgOQlbTwCMhw+yrjqflx5w5LDR90=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G8qiM-uEDYr1; Wed, 5 May 2021 03:30:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 5 May 2021 03:30:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 715DE4D73F; Tue, 4 May 2021 21:30:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3BA4D73E; Tue, 4 May 2021 21:30:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 21:30:45 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <162017811563.5901.16868724807040240081@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <f18b31b1-a2f9-24a9-1cf2-d02ee23ad69@nohats.ca>
References: <162017811563.5901.16868724807040240081@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/b0wOMNiGNh4a52-WZqmGHwRWgNo>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-labeled-ipsec-05.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 01:30:56 -0000
On Tue, 4 May 2021, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > Subject: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-labeled-ipsec-05.txt > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme-labeled-ipsec-05 No major changes. Mostly a bump to prevent expiration. Updated affiliation, fixed a reference and updated the implementation section. Still looking for another implementation for interop testing. Paul & Sahana
- [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-labeled-ip… internet-drafts
- Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-labele… Paul Wouters