Re: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual interim meeting (revised date)
Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Tue, 07 May 2013 13:37 UTC
Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2BE21F8FDB for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 06:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.351
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.351 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.248, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qph82VrQEtTN for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 06:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C07621F8FB2 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2013 06:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.34.150]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r47DbJcp008011; Tue, 7 May 2013 16:37:19 +0300
X-CheckPoint: {51890203-A-1B221DC2-1FFFF}
Received: from IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.2.54]) by DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.3.48]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Tue, 7 May 2013 16:37:19 +0300
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: Valery Smyslov <svanru@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual interim meeting (revised date)
Thread-Index: AQHORam5ZxuxdS9gCkedkzry4uPQm5j5tSZ7///Sw4CAADeIQ///0u0A
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 13:37:18 +0000
Message-ID: <FA2919E2-11FF-4CE4-8610-9CD711C0200F@checkpoint.com>
References: <517FCC2A.8060904@gmail.com> <1D5C3857EF7C48AF9A952CB5AEA3CB21@buildpc> <F4E83D4E-8166-412B-9694-F40034DB55A5@checkpoint.com> <5DCEA3A89A1346958FC20B990E5D68C8@buildpc>
In-Reply-To: <5DCEA3A89A1346958FC20B990E5D68C8@buildpc>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.31.21.134]
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean
x-cpdlp: 11013f2ddec6cd790c1002d1d9f838aad0c89e6c87
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <99C87119CC201542AF94B5652F8E4591@ad.checkpoint.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual interim meeting (revised date)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 13:37:28 -0000
On May 7, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Valery Smyslov <svanru@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> The reason > we abandoned this technology is that the broken SOHO devices began to not only drop fragments, but to also >> drop anything that wasn't TCP to a specific group of ports. IKE-over-TCP could not solve this issue. > > Unfortunately, IKE fragmentation couldn't solve this either… And so, SSL-VPN clients were born…
- [IPsec] IPsecME virtual interim meeting (revised … Yaron Sheffer
- Re: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual interim meeting (revi… Valery Smyslov
- Re: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual interim meeting (revi… Yoav Nir
- Re: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual interim meeting (revi… Valery Smyslov
- Re: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual interim meeting (revi… Yoav Nir