IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Some comments / questions on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ad-vpn-problem

Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 07 December 2012 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D49721F8925 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 09:51:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.427
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.427 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.171, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a9A5INFzXvSh for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 09:51:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com (mail-qa0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD62A21F88C1 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 09:51:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id z4so2134957qan.10 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 09:51:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=M3EJBUQYBrnNa1IBHsDIgZ3LkKhkA4PvVY8nHFh3oeM=; b=KZPL/IHc0YtTGXv1/FFU/Mg2Fmh1RSRbkWsqBPjHyI5lqjFbOZ6RvRcrML0VeSczdw Ue1NJYg+Rf4Jk13JcT9yoReYobr+Lf2Gc6DcJAijxNhNMFH76FWpZjSRjfvGu7ogEYBn UGLLkCU4bo2g8ZfH5L/l+3aRYqlxmz4I/xHRHq0o2vmtJdf9/Mh2Eifh7Sxtammz39JT sIPJZC4K04wek+8nzfWM3+zOemP+Mpsut6mk75A3aqWoMC6L8i9qB3LG7qE+tEZcwsk+ oqmFaNO4TyveeTycGN6edm7h4aYpQQhhNFyPJ3XwcA0VW+HY59HyDiE3BvvnIOE6hbIw JqAA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.73.105 with SMTP id k9mr11744423qev.6.1354902661469; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 09:51:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.92.77 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 09:51:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50C1FB15.4050301@labn.net>
References: <50A5703F.4070305@labn.net> <CAOyVPHSvWhgaYm2s_8_37VuaR1e_5tiJai+04AKzm3HXkNwESg@mail.gmail.com> <50A689A9.1090803@labn.net> <CAOyVPHR1euA9TRnAp7V+OKjRkPARYYvQ+C0HnA70y-122sy9ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <50A68D30.2040203@labn.net> <CAOyVPHR4OVNuvMU-UxZAJUoKFugCWwUQq0dSRo-7gY=Y886LoQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOyVPHRopwvE5U3ZF7kDxNe59OgTk7ydoFG6iqvZdOFUCvaGyA@mail.gmail.com> <50BE30D9.4030903@labn.net> <CAOyVPHSXQQt_31Y2MP+iMe8d0MCxSyKzVvCLL-HLkcggaOKuMw@mail.gmail.com> <50BE4A60.1000303@labn.net> <CAOyVPHSkGVvGD2bMgk-vp3DO0o9N9Zt6mf4SnaL4L9ZFR8NRHg@mail.gmail.com> <50BFA4C0.1060909@labn.net> <CAOyVPHQu+NyQvxMjHJ0=0YtrH6rerU-etEmqQKTKP4jt4sHZgw@mail.gmail.com> <50BFCA9A.4030502@labn.net> <CAOyVPHQyVz0jCAFGdqLpCxE2tm5TBCkEXKLPBxigQasw=wNW9Q@mail.gmail.com> <50C0EEE9.7000904@labn.net> <CAOyVPHSJ2o_tGjMBKTepnGbEAZEHMBR6fijG8Fy6c7aMWxrDRw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOyVPHQ6q=FxOEWtQ3Rt3Pqobo+2q2frBMoqvfEH+k=0mm2wpw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOyVPHT9Rj5TnjVVn2HQZUOBMEUG5iXmae_JWrD9MQtU0tUSiQ@mail.gmail.com> <50C1FB15.4050301@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 09:51:01 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOyVPHQu_rUkiNVow53kCjv-=DTgEJf573cmhxUrMdm-NSuOrA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b67897cd794c804d046db2f"
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Some comments / questions on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ad-vpn-problem
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:51:14 -0000

Updated. Will post the document across.

-Vishwas

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

> The ADVPN solution SHOULD NOT increase the amount of information
>    required to configure protocols running over IPsec tunnels.
>

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status