[IPsec] ICV sizes

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sat, 08 March 2014 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19ACC1A0218 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 06:21:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a7hfJJNSiULX for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 06:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6E21A0159 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 06:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.207.200.36] (host86-189-2-69.range86-189.btcentralplus.com [86.189.2.69]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s28EL63i077215 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 8 Mar 2014 07:21:09 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host host86-189-2-69.range86-189.btcentralplus.com [86.189.2.69] claimed to be [10.207.200.36]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE71206CF439363@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 14:21:05 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <55D8171A-FF38-45A1-B299-4EB5189743A7@vpnc.org>
References: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE71206CF439363@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
To: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/bnj2xMvDWOKSgnfLBNSyhr1utXA
Cc: ipsec <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: [IPsec] ICV sizes
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 14:21:19 -0000

On Mar 8, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Black, David <david.black@emc.com> wrote:

> I have no strong opinion on ICV size for GCM and GMAC, but I am interested
> in the outcome as an author of the Block Storage IPsec profile update
> (draft-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update-04).  That draft does not currently
> express requirements on ICV length.  That draft's in Authors 48 hours at
> the moment as part of the entire iSCSI draft cluster, and it could be held
> to apply the ICV length outcome determined here if that were deemed important.

Making technical changes to a document in AUTH48 is a really bad idea. If you were not specific enough when writing the draft, you should probably just leave it alone.

--Paul Hoffman