Extended seq number
Ramana Yarlagadda <ramana.yarlagadda@analog.com> Tue, 23 April 2002 17:57 UTC
Received: from lists.tislabs.com (portal.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.101]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g3NHvXa02912; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA14365 Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:16:58 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.1.20020423101249.00b98690@golf.cpgdesign.analog.com>
X-Sender: ramana@golf.cpgdesign.analog.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:26:57 -0700
To: ipsec_forum <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
From: Ramana Yarlagadda <ramana.yarlagadda@analog.com>
Subject: Extended seq number
In-Reply-To: <009f01c1ead4$03e748e0$04a7c6ca@server>
References: <002401c1e9ce$61e46f60$04a7c6ca@server> <3CC53899.E39D1F3A@F-Secure.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk
Hi, All I am going thruough the Draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-v3-02.txt. 1) Extended Sequence number is of 64bits (optioanally) and the ICV is calucluated over the entire 64bits.but the sequence number transmitted is of 32 bits , to keep the overhead low. Because of this requirement implementaion becomes quite complex, at least not straight forward. what we frame (IPSec header) is different from what we send. -cheers -ramana
- About UDP Encapsulation of IPsec Packets Jerry Yao
- Re: About UDP Encapsulation of IPsec Packets Ari Huttunen
- Thanks for answering: About UDP Encapsulation of … Jerry Yao
- Re: Thanks for answering: About UDP Encapsulation… Bill Sommerfeld
- Extended seq number Ramana Yarlagadda