Re: is manual keying mandatory

[Steve Sneddon <[e-mail]>]

I totally agree - no changes & no delay.

I wasn't proposing changing the MUST. I was only trying to understand the
parameters on what had to "work" in order for an implementation to be called
"compliant". I think I understand that now from the information from the
respondents, and the lack thereof from others.

Thanks folks, and sorry for any consternation I may have caused.

At 05:47 PM 3/23/98 -0500, Bronislav Kavsan wrote:
>Dave Carrel wrote:
>
>> We all know why manual keying doesn't scale and we
>> all know why it's impractical in most real world situations.
>
>Just admitting this makes this MUST a big joke....As far as the danger of
delaying
>the documents - I agree - we shouldn't delay.
>--
>Bronislav Kavsan
>IRE Secure Solutions, Inc.
>100 Conifer Hill Drive  Suite 513
>Danvers, MA  01923
>voice: 978-739-2384
>http://www.ire.com
>
>
>
>
>