IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08: (with DISCUSS)

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 15 December 2022 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C36C14CE47; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 14:01:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sTIkm3lC3iCb; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 14:01:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B15AC1522BD; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 14:01:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NY5lt0t1Hz9XL; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 23:01:14 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1671141674; bh=5bZwxywZwa/n8iQsyttOBhb2gezXxYn3S5+D/cf5tqQ=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=sWQInI8e1qWtkzGiLZwF+OiXGW9+McdLq/uS8F1MD6mghr4/2ehxfj06qYpdlxRj0 L1XWa8UiDdIJwnJt7cOaJEb0DZjlMAFd9B97Vt0+bEj1Zl2sWw3rPWmBqqz/M9O8q9 vNE08aFkMkK/g5Z7EGmYfLJs/qizsFzTQZTOxE9E=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MLZZWTYmdBAe; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 23:01:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 23:01:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 02E7642536D; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 17:01:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F365242536C; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 17:01:11 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 17:01:11 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic@ietf.org, ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org, "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+N=RG0bUjq9kUCTOj6eJRfpSyraF-+BVLTmwvgSHDHiA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0bb8aaec-ef12-09ec-9b7a-f7c1ad88f1cc@nohats.ca>
References: <167094324735.45634.6215476133161483286@ietfa.amsl.com> <ca431827-6090-dba7-6280-20bed8ebf37d@nohats.ca> <CAHw9_i+5aaasAdWU-pu-geGX6StrR6vzHTHmzcVGCo8FYruaxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_i+N=RG0bUjq9kUCTOj6eJRfpSyraF-+BVLTmwvgSHDHiA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/d6LnzyLTFVJZNvgJmaZHxKOV3eI>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 22:01:23 -0000

On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Warren Kumari wrote:

> Subject: Re: [IPsec] Warren Kumari's Discuss on
>     draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08: (with DISCUSS)

Francesca / Warren: would these changes resolve your points? I kept
the word deprecated as Roman pointed out that is exactly what the TLS
1.0/1.1 document did. But clarified that the usage guidance for the
crypto algorithms is updated by this document. And I added a note for
IANA to add a Note to the registry pages as Francesca recommended:


--- draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08.txt	2022-12-15 16:31:35.171452645 -0500
+++ draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-09.txt	2022-12-15 16:36:34.171942102 -0500
@@ -16,11 +16,12 @@

     Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) has been deprecated and its
     specification in RFC2407, RFC2408 and RFC2409 have been moved to
-   Historic status.  A number of old algorithms that are associated with
-   IKEv1, and not widely implemented for IKEv2 are deprecated as well.
-   This document updates RFC 8221 and RFC 8247 and adds a Status column
-   to the IANA IKEv2 Transform Type registries that shows the
-   deprecation status.
+   Historic status.  This document updates RFC 8221 and RFC 8247 to
+   reflect the usage guidelines of old algorithms that are associated
+   with IKEv1 and are not specified or commonly implemented for IKEv2.
+   This document further updates the IANA IKEv2 Transform Type
+   registries to add a Status column where deprecation status can be
+   listed.

      [...]

  7.  IANA Considerations

-   This document instructs IANA to add an additional Status column to
-   the IKEv2 Transform Type registries and mark the following entries as
-   DEPRECATED:
+   This document instructs IANA to insert the following line at the top
+   of the Notes section of the 'Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Attributes'
+   registry and the '"Magic Numbers" for ISAKMP Protocol' registry: All
+   registries listed below have been closed, see RFCxxxx.  [Note to RFC
+   Editor: change RFCxxx to this document's RFC number]
+
+   This document further instructs IANA to add an additional Status
+   column to the IKEv2 Transform Type registries and mark the following
+   entries as DEPRECATED:

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email