[IPsec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6311 (3615)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 08 May 2013 13:05 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1671721F85EF for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 06:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.333
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.267, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k2JqaRwXLJhE for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 06:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77EA21F85CE for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2013 06:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 1AB75B1E004; Wed, 8 May 2013 06:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
To: rsj@cisco.com, kagarigi@cisco.com, ynir@checkpoint.com, yaronf.ietf@gmail.com, zhangdacheng@huawei.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, turners@ieca.com, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, yaronf.ietf@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20130508130540.1AB75B1E004@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 06:05:40 -0700
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 May 2013 08:01:13 -0700
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org, ynir@checkpoint.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [IPsec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6311 (3615)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 13:05:52 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6311, "Protocol Support for High Availability of IKEv2/IPsec". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6311&eid=3615 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Section: 6.4 Original Text ------------- Note that this solution requires that either all Child SAs use Extended Sequence Numbers (ESNs) or else that no Child SA uses ESNs. Corrected Text -------------- Note that this solution requires that either all Child SAs use Extended Sequence Numbers (ESN) or else that no Child SA uses ESN. Notes ----- "ESN" is used here as a name of a feature. There is no need to pluralize it. This is different from "SAs" or "SPIs", where there are many of each. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6311 (draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsecha-protocol-06) -------------------------------------- Title : Protocol Support for High Availability of IKEv2/IPsec Publication Date : July 2011 Author(s) : R. Singh, Ed., G. Kalyani, Y. Nir, Y. Sheffer, D. Zhang Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IP Security Maintenance and Extensions Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [IPsec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6311 (3615) RFC Errata System
- Re: [IPsec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6311 (… Paul Hoffman