Re: [IPsec] WESP - Roadmap Ahead

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Wed, 11 November 2009 23:56 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A703A6B72 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:56:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.526
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.526 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.073, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WMLlBzWUpa3q for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:56:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.kivinen.iki.fi (fireball.acr.fi [83.145.195.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7113A6993 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:56:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nABNuqkG028957 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:56:52 +0200 (EET)
Received: (from kivinen@localhost) by fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.3/8.12.11) id nABNuqeN006455; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:56:52 +0200 (EET)
X-Authentication-Warning: fireball.kivinen.iki.fi: kivinen set sender to kivinen@iki.fi using -f
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <19195.20292.100878.21682@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:56:52 +0200
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: Scott C Moonen <smoonen@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <OFF6A67C78.1AD019EA-ON8525766B.00727DFC-8525766B.0073F530@us.ibm.com>
References: <dc8fd0140911110805q67759507t6cf75a1e9d81c5aa@mail.gmail.com> <OFF6A67C78.1AD019EA-ON8525766B.00727DFC-8525766B.0073F530@us.ibm.com>
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1
X-Edit-Time: 4 min
X-Total-Time: 3 min
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org, Jack Kohn <kohn.jack@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] WESP - Roadmap Ahead
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:56:28 -0000

Scott C Moonen writes:
> Jack, I'm not sure it's clear yet whether WESP will be widely adopted. 
> There's disagreement between end-node and middle-node folks as to whether 
> WESP or heuristics are the best approach for inspection of ESP-NULL 
> traffic.  I think that end-node vendors will be very reluctant to adopt 
> WESP widely until there is broad customer demand for it, and I'm not sure 
> that this demand will ever materialize.

I agree on that... 

> This is all my personal opinion, of course.  But it seems to me that 
> heuristics will have to be adopted by competitive middle-node vendors, and 
> therefore (barring any extensions to WESP that make it attractive for 
> other reasons) the use of heuristics will probably always be more 
> widespread and will dampen the demand for WESP.  Additionally, ESP-NULL 
> itself has rather narrow applicability in an environment where end-to-end 
> encryption is increasingly common, which further limits the cases where 
> there will be an absolute need for WESP.  Furthermore, there will always 
> be valid reasons to use AH (reduced overhead compared to WESP).

And wider protection, i.e. IP addresses and options... 

> For reasons like these, I believe it's premature to call for deprecation 
> of AH and even more premature to start preferring WESP to ESP.

Agree on that too. 

> What status will the WESP RFC have?  Experimental, informational, 
> standards track, etc.?

It is aimed for proposed standard, altough I would be happier if would
be aimed for experimental. 
-- 
kivinen@iki.fi