RE: Status of SCTP

juha.ollila@nokia.com Fri, 26 April 2002 14:17 UTC

From: juha.ollila@nokia.com
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: RE: Status of SCTP
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:50:33 +0300
Message-ID: <B49318639A71D3418DC1005FD40B36100EB4FF@ouebe005.NOE.Nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: Status of SCTP
Thread-Index: AcHrfSOUojRSIWioStGTv1KG4e8bLQBpkYbg
To: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk

	Hello!

I'm sorry about the stupid questions. I should have remembered
"RTFM first" ;-)

draft-ietf-ipsec-jfk-03 specifies in section 5:

    JFK supports two different address types: a list of IPv4 address
    ranges, and a list of IPv6 address ranges.  A single address is a
    range where the starting and ending elements are the same.
    Subnets are converted to range format.  The notion of "all
    addresses" is expressed as the pair (0, 0xFFFFFFFF) for IPv4; v6
    is handled similarly.

and draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-01 specifies in section 2.9:

   IKEv2 is more flexible than IKEv1. IKEv2 allows sets of ranges of
   both addresses and ports, and allows the Responder to choose a subset
   of the requested traffic rather than simply responding "not
   acceptable".

It seems that both JFK and IKEv2 support SCTP's set of addresses
(multihoming) feature.

What about the draft-ietf-ipsec-sctp draft? Is it already submitted
to the IESG? I didn't find any information about
the draft-ietf-ipsec-sctp on the home page of the IESG.

Best Regards,
Juha Ollila

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ollila Juha (NET/Oulu) 
> Sent: 24 April, 2002 13:45
> To: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> Subject: Status of SCTP
> 
> 
> 	Hello!
> 
> What is the status of draft-ietf-ipsec-sctp? Will it be 
> submitted as Draft Standard in October?
> 
> Is it planned to add support for SCTP in IKEv2 or JFK?
> 
> Best Regards,
> Juha Ollila
>

Status of SCTP juha.ollila
RE: Status of SCTP juha.ollila